Ap World History 2010 Q3 Free Essays

WORLD HISTORY 2010 SCORING GUIDELINES Question 3 †Comparative BASIC CORE (capability) 0â€7 Points 1. Has worthy postulation. 1 Point †¢ The proposition must incorporate both a substantial similitude and a legitimate distinction in techniques for political control in two of the realms. We will compose a custom article test on Ap World History 2010 Q3 or on the other hand any comparable theme just for you Request Now †¢ The theory must be pertinent to the timespan, yet the dates need not be express. †¢ The proposition must be expressly expressed in the presentation or the predefined finish of the paper. †¢ The proposal may show up as one sentence or as different sentences. †¢ A theory that is part among different sections or simply rehashes the brief is unsuitable. The postulation CANNOT mean some other point. 2. Addresses all pieces of the inquiry, however not really equally or completely. 2 Points For 2 focuses: †¢ Identifies in any event one legitimate likeness and one substantial distinction in techniques for political control. †¢ Discusses two realms however not really equally. For 1 point: †¢ Identifies in any event one substantial comparability or if nothing else one legitimate distinction in strategies for political control. †¢ Discusses two domains however not really uniformly. 3. Proves theory with suitable chronicled proof. 2 Points For 2 focuses: Must give in any event five explicit bits of proof (at any rate two from every domain). †¢ Evidence must be inside the assigned timespans (e. g. , proof from the Roman Republic or Qin tradition isn't satisfactory). For 1 point: †¢ Must give at any rate three explicit bits of proof (at any rate one from every realm). †¢ Evidence must be inside the assigned timespans. 4. Makes in any event one immediate, important examination between/among social orders. 1 Point (The immediate examination may talk about either similitudes or contrasts. ) †¢ To gain this point, the examination must be made some place other than in the theory. . Investigates at any rate one purpose behind a similitude or a disti nction recognized in an immediate examination. †¢ Analysis (motivation behind why) must be identified with a similitude or a distinction in techniques for political control between the two realms. Subtotal 1 Point 7 Points  © 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web: www. collegeboard. com. AP ® WORLD HISTORY 2010 SCORING GUIDELINES Question 3 †Comparative (proceeded) EXPANDED CORE (greatness) Expands past essential center of 1â€7 focuses. An understudy must gain 7 focuses in the essential center region before acquiring focuses in the extended center zone. 0â€2 Points Models: †¢ Has an unmistakable, scientific and complete theory. †¢ Addresses all pieces of the inquiry altogether (as pertinent): examinations, order, causation, associations, topics, communications, content. †¢ Provides sufficient recorded proof to validate proposal. †¢ Relates correlations with bigger worldwide setting. †¢ Makes a few immediate, applicable examinations between or among social orders. †¢ Consistently breaks down the circumstances and end results of pertinent likenesses and contrasts. †¢ Applies significant information on different locales or world verifiable procedures. †¢ Discusses change after some time (e. g. changing techniques for political control as the realms declined). †¢ Recognizes subtleties inside realms. Subtotal 2 Points TOTAL 9 Points  © 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web: www. collegeboard. com.  © 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web: www. collegeboard. co m.  © 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web: www. collegeboard. com.  © 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web: www. collegeboard. com.  © 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web: www. collegeboard. com.  © 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web: www. ollegeboard. com.  © 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web: www. collegeboard. com.  © 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web: www. collegeboard. com.  © 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web: www. collegeboard. com. AP ® WORLD HISTORY 2010 SCORING COMMENTARY Question 3 Overview The goal of the inquiry was for understudies to pick two of the specified domains †Han China (206 B. C. E. to 220 C. E. ), Mauryan/Gupta India (320 B. C. E. to 550 C. E. ), Imperial Rome (31 B. C. E. to 476 C. E. ) †and analyze the manners in which those realms applied political command over their masses. Understudies were expressly advised to examine the two likenesses and contrasts in techniques for political control. Test: 3A Score: 8 The paper contains a legitimate proposition in the second and third sentences of the principal passage (1 point). In the fourth section, the exposition tends to a likeness (â€Å"Both domains had temperamental borders†) and a few contrasts, including â€Å"However, Han China managed the Turkic Huns through the tribute frameworks, in this manner appeasing them with endowments and staying away from exorbitant costly fighting, which Rome favored when managing their enemies† (2 focuses). In spite of the fact that there is sufficient proof for the Han, Roman proof is constrained by conversation of the Republic, which couldn't be tallied. There is, be that as it may, enough proof for 2 proof focuses. Notwithstanding the immediate examination recorded above, there is another distinction at the base of the second passage †â€Å"However, on the grounds that there was less accentuation as an aggregate gathering in Rome, the political association was significantly less organized than China’s† †which earned 1 point for the correlation and 1 point in light of the fact that the announcement additionally includes an investigation. This exposition contained a mind boggling proposition, adequate profundity of correlation, and supporting proof to procure 1 Expanded Core point. Test: 3B Score: 6 This paper contains a substantial proposition in the principal passage (1 point) and addresses the two similitudes and contrasts (2 focuses). There is adequate proof for both the Mauryan/Gupta and the Han domains (2 focuses). The immediate correlation is found in the subsequent passage: â€Å"Han China and Maurya Gupta [sic] both combined their capacity through military buildup† (1 point). The paper endeavors investigation in the close to the last passage yet just breaks down the Han: â€Å"Due to their absence of a sincere religion, China had the option to acclimatize the Huns when they started to attack China. † There is no examination of a correlation of Han and Mauryan/Gupta techniques for political control. Test: 3C Score: 3 There is no legitimate theory in light of the fact that the article endeavors to show a contrast among Han and Rome regarding the Roman Republic, which is outside the timespan. The paper just tends to similitudes, not legitimate contrasts (1 point). The proof is adequate for the Han, however the main substantial bit of proof for Rome is the explanation that â€Å"He [Augustus] crushed Cleopatra and Mark Anthony ensuring that Rome is politically secured† (1 point). The vast majority of the Roman proof is before 31 B. C. E. what's more, along these lines didn't procure credit. The article has a legitimate direct correlation in the fourth passage: â€Å"The size of the two realms was an issue that prompted pioneers at last losing political control of both empires† (1 point).  © 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web: www. collegeboard. com. The most effective method to refer to Ap World History 2010 Q3, Papers