Ap World History 2010 Q3 Free Essays

WORLD HISTORY 2010 SCORING GUIDELINES Question 3 †Comparative BASIC CORE (capability) 0â€7 Points 1. Has worthy postulation. 1 Point †¢ The proposition must incorporate both a substantial similitude and a legitimate distinction in techniques for political control in two of the realms. We will compose a custom article test on Ap World History 2010 Q3 or on the other hand any comparable theme just for you Request Now †¢ The theory must be pertinent to the timespan, yet the dates need not be express. †¢ The proposition must be expressly expressed in the presentation or the predefined finish of the paper. †¢ The proposal may show up as one sentence or as different sentences. †¢ A theory that is part among different sections or simply rehashes the brief is unsuitable. The postulation CANNOT mean some other point. 2. Addresses all pieces of the inquiry, however not really equally or completely. 2 Points For 2 focuses: †¢ Identifies in any event one legitimate likeness and one substantial distinction in techniques for political control. †¢ Discusses two realms however not really equally. For 1 point: †¢ Identifies in any event one substantial comparability or if nothing else one legitimate distinction in strategies for political control. †¢ Discusses two domains however not really uniformly. 3. Proves theory with suitable chronicled proof. 2 Points For 2 focuses: Must give in any event five explicit bits of proof (at any rate two from every domain). †¢ Evidence must be inside the assigned timespans (e. g. , proof from the Roman Republic or Qin tradition isn't satisfactory). For 1 point: †¢ Must give at any rate three explicit bits of proof (at any rate one from every realm). †¢ Evidence must be inside the assigned timespans. 4. Makes in any event one immediate, important examination between/among social orders. 1 Point (The immediate examination may talk about either similitudes or contrasts. ) †¢ To gain this point, the examination must be made some place other than in the theory. . Investigates at any rate one purpose behind a similitude or a disti nction recognized in an immediate examination. †¢ Analysis (motivation behind why) must be identified with a similitude or a distinction in techniques for political control between the two realms. Subtotal 1 Point 7 Points  © 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web: www. collegeboard. com. AP ® WORLD HISTORY 2010 SCORING GUIDELINES Question 3 †Comparative (proceeded) EXPANDED CORE (greatness) Expands past essential center of 1â€7 focuses. An understudy must gain 7 focuses in the essential center region before acquiring focuses in the extended center zone. 0â€2 Points Models: †¢ Has an unmistakable, scientific and complete theory. †¢ Addresses all pieces of the inquiry altogether (as pertinent): examinations, order, causation, associations, topics, communications, content. †¢ Provides sufficient recorded proof to validate proposal. †¢ Relates correlations with bigger worldwide setting. †¢ Makes a few immediate, applicable examinations between or among social orders. †¢ Consistently breaks down the circumstances and end results of pertinent likenesses and contrasts. †¢ Applies significant information on different locales or world verifiable procedures. †¢ Discusses change after some time (e. g. changing techniques for political control as the realms declined). †¢ Recognizes subtleties inside realms. Subtotal 2 Points TOTAL 9 Points  © 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web: www. collegeboard. com.  © 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web: www. collegeboard. co m.  © 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web: www. collegeboard. com.  © 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web: www. collegeboard. com.  © 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web: www. collegeboard. com.  © 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web: www. ollegeboard. com.  © 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web: www. collegeboard. com.  © 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web: www. collegeboard. com.  © 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web: www. collegeboard. com. AP ® WORLD HISTORY 2010 SCORING COMMENTARY Question 3 Overview The goal of the inquiry was for understudies to pick two of the specified domains †Han China (206 B. C. E. to 220 C. E. ), Mauryan/Gupta India (320 B. C. E. to 550 C. E. ), Imperial Rome (31 B. C. E. to 476 C. E. ) †and analyze the manners in which those realms applied political command over their masses. Understudies were expressly advised to examine the two likenesses and contrasts in techniques for political control. Test: 3A Score: 8 The paper contains a legitimate proposition in the second and third sentences of the principal passage (1 point). In the fourth section, the exposition tends to a likeness (â€Å"Both domains had temperamental borders†) and a few contrasts, including â€Å"However, Han China managed the Turkic Huns through the tribute frameworks, in this manner appeasing them with endowments and staying away from exorbitant costly fighting, which Rome favored when managing their enemies† (2 focuses). In spite of the fact that there is sufficient proof for the Han, Roman proof is constrained by conversation of the Republic, which couldn't be tallied. There is, be that as it may, enough proof for 2 proof focuses. Notwithstanding the immediate examination recorded above, there is another distinction at the base of the second passage †â€Å"However, on the grounds that there was less accentuation as an aggregate gathering in Rome, the political association was significantly less organized than China’s† †which earned 1 point for the correlation and 1 point in light of the fact that the announcement additionally includes an investigation. This exposition contained a mind boggling proposition, adequate profundity of correlation, and supporting proof to procure 1 Expanded Core point. Test: 3B Score: 6 This paper contains a substantial proposition in the principal passage (1 point) and addresses the two similitudes and contrasts (2 focuses). There is adequate proof for both the Mauryan/Gupta and the Han domains (2 focuses). The immediate correlation is found in the subsequent passage: â€Å"Han China and Maurya Gupta [sic] both combined their capacity through military buildup† (1 point). The paper endeavors investigation in the close to the last passage yet just breaks down the Han: â€Å"Due to their absence of a sincere religion, China had the option to acclimatize the Huns when they started to attack China. † There is no examination of a correlation of Han and Mauryan/Gupta techniques for political control. Test: 3C Score: 3 There is no legitimate theory in light of the fact that the article endeavors to show a contrast among Han and Rome regarding the Roman Republic, which is outside the timespan. The paper just tends to similitudes, not legitimate contrasts (1 point). The proof is adequate for the Han, however the main substantial bit of proof for Rome is the explanation that â€Å"He [Augustus] crushed Cleopatra and Mark Anthony ensuring that Rome is politically secured† (1 point). The vast majority of the Roman proof is before 31 B. C. E. what's more, along these lines didn't procure credit. The article has a legitimate direct correlation in the fourth passage: â€Å"The size of the two realms was an issue that prompted pioneers at last losing political control of both empires† (1 point).  © 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web: www. collegeboard. com. The most effective method to refer to Ap World History 2010 Q3, Papers

Chaucers The Canterbury Tales Essay -- Chaucer Canterbury Tales Essay

Chaucer's The Canterbury Tales In The Canterbury Tales, Geoffrey Chaucer remarks on moral debasement inside the Roman Catholic Church. He reprimands some high-positioning individuals from the Church and depicts an absence of profound quality in medieval society; yet in the â€Å"Retraction,† Chaucer abnegates a lot of his work and promises to be consistent with Christianity. Apparently inverse perspectives exist inside the â€Å"Retraction† and The Canterbury Tales. Be that as it may, this logical inconsistency doesn't debilitate Chaucer’s social editorial. Or maybe, the â€Å"Retraction† underlines Chaucer’s analysis of the Church and society in The Canterbury Tales by fortifying the hazard intrinsic in doing as such. In The Canterbury Tales Chaucer depicts the Roman Catholic Church as an organization wherein defilement spins out of control. Chaucer assaults practically the entirety of the explorers who are authorities of the Church. For instance, in â€Å"The General Prologue,† the Prioress is â€Å"so altruistic thus pitous† that she takes care of her lapdogs â€Å"With rosted flessh, or milk and wastelbreed† (143, 147). In any case, thinking about the ruined state of numerous individuals during the Middle Ages, would it not be progressively magnanimous for the Prioress to give meat, milk and bread to poor people, rather than to her canines? Moreover, the Friar breaks the Franciscan pledges of neediness, modesty and administration. Rather than helping outsiders and homeless people, the Friar â€Å"knew [knows] the tavernes wel in each town,/And each hostiler and tappestere† (GP 241-2). The Friar is likewise rich from the benefits of paid off admissions; he dislike a p oor Franciscan should, yet â€Å"lik a maister or a pope† (GP 263). The Pardoner likewise concedes and even brags about his own dishonest ethics. He clarifies that the relics he sells are phony, alongside the exculpations he gi... ... the nearness of defilement inside the Church; the individual premiums of the Wife of Bath, the Franklin, and even the Sergeant at Law mirror the impacts of the Church in the public eye. The glaring difference between the sincere tone of the â€Å"Retraction† and the basic tone of The Canterbury Tales feature Chaucer’s critique on the defilement of the Church. The â€Å"Retraction† helps the peruser to remember the extreme outcomes of contradicting the Church during the Middle Ages. Chaucer’s calling of confidence, which shows up so outside of any relevant connection to the subject at hand in contrast with numerous parts of The Canterbury Tales, really strengthens the topic of defilement inside the Roman Catholic Church and inside society. Independently, the â€Å"Retraction† and The Canterbury Tales give differentiating perspectives on medieval life; together, they make a bound together record of individual unethical behavior brought about by defilement of the Church. Chaucer's The Canterbury Tales Essay - Chaucer Canterbury Tales Essay Chaucer's The Canterbury Tales In The Canterbury Tales, Geoffrey Chaucer remarks on moral defilement inside the Roman Catholic Church. He condemns some high-positioning individuals from the Church and portrays an absence of ethical quality in medieval society; yet in the â€Å"Retraction,† Chaucer abnegates a lot of his work and promises to be consistent with Christianity. Apparently inverse perspectives exist inside the â€Å"Retraction† and The Canterbury Tales. Be that as it may, this logical inconsistency doesn't debilitate Chaucer’s social editorial. Or maybe, the â€Å"Retraction† accentuates Chaucer’s analysis of the Church and society in The Canterbury Tales by fortifying the hazard intrinsic in doing as such. In The Canterbury Tales Chaucer depicts the Roman Catholic Church as an establishment where debasement spins out of control. Chaucer assaults practically the entirety of the travelers who are authorities of the Church. For instance, in â€Å"The General Prologue,† the Prioress is â€Å"so altruistic thus pitous† that she takes care of her lapdogs â€Å"With rosted flessh, or milk and wastelbreed† (143, 147). In any case, thinking about the ruined state of numerous individuals during the Middle Ages, would it not be progressively magnanimous for the Prioress to give meat, milk and bread to poor people, rather than to her canines? Moreover, the Friar breaks the Franciscan promises of destitution, purity and administration. Rather than helping outsiders and poor people, the Friar â€Å"knew [knows] the tavernes wel in each town,/And each hostiler and tappestere† (GP 241-2). The Friar is likewise rich from the benefits of paid off admissions; he dislike a poor Franciscan should, however â€Å"lik a maister or a pope† (GP 263). The Pardoner likewise concedes and even gloats about his own misleading ethics. He clarifies that the relics he sells are phony, alongside the exonerations he gi... ... the nearness of defilement inside the Church; the individual premiums of the Wife of Bath, the Franklin, and even the Sergeant at Law mirror the impacts of the Church in the public eye. The distinct difference between the passionate tone of the â€Å"Retraction† and the basic tone of The Canterbury Tales feature Chaucer’s editorial on the debasement of the Church. The â€Å"Retraction† helps the peruser to remember the extreme results of contradicting the Church during the Middle Ages. Chaucer’s calling of confidence, which shows up so outside of any relevant connection to the issue at hand in contrast with numerous parts of The Canterbury Tales, really strengthens the topic of defilement inside the Roman Catholic Church and inside society. Independently, the â€Å"Retraction† and The Canterbury Tales give differentiating perspectives on medieval life; together, they make a bound together record of individual unethical behavior brought about by defilement of the Church.

How to Find Friends in College

How to Find Friends in College 6 Steps to Find Friends in College Home›Education Posts›6 Steps to Find Friends in College Education PostsCollege is a time of new experiences, new opportunities, and new friends. A lot of students who graduated from colleges and universities claim that friends whom they found while studying become the ones on whom they can rely now. Of course, when you are a freshman, you are scared and have no idea how to find at least one friend. But stop worrying since you may not know that college environment is the best place to meet new people and establish solid and warn relationship with them. When in college, you are surrounded by potential friends, therefore, you just need to choose a person or a few with whom you can form strong bonds. Yes, now you may not understand how to do this but it is as simple as ABC and you will see this after reading these 6 recommendations. So, let us start to examine 6 simple steps to find friends in college.Stay yourselfAll people are unique and this is the most wonderful thing since such person like you is the only one. Stay yourself, since under the mask, people don’t see what kind of person you are. We always expect sincerity from other people but very often we hide our real face. Truly, we all are unique but we may have the same interests or hobbies that is why we find friends and share our impressions with them.Be niceEverybody loves nice people. Take care about people whom you encounter, inquire about their businesses, people will notice this and will want to know you better.Find common interestsCommon interests, experiences and hobbies are the first reason why people become friends. This brings people together and makes their pastime more exciting and interesting.Take part in extracurricular activitiesBeing involved in something that you like with other people is cool. This creates tight bonds between people and there is always a subject to talk about.Have a dinner with othersDining with others is a good way to communicate with people and get closer to them.Go to partiesCollege is not a place only for studying. Almost everyone is well aware of big crazy parties which take place in every college. So, believe me, if you are in college, you cannot miss the most interesting part of college life. Visiting party, you for sure find new friends, have great time, and receive unforgettable impressions.Following even some of these rules will help you to make college friends. And in conclusion, one small tip â€" visit Qualitycustomessays.com as it can become one of your best friends in the most difficult situations.